Sunday, January 10, 2016
New Jersey Gun Law Info
New Jersey Gun Laws Bias against Law Abiding Citizens
N.J. Gun Laws are antiquated and only punish law abiding citizens. First you apply and have to wait at least 3 months before you get approved. Then you can only buy (1) handgun within a 30 day period. If you buy a car, clothes, groceries or set of kitchen knifes (which can also be considered weapons if used improperly) you pay for them and walk out the door, What makes them any different from legally purchasing a firearm and taking it with you the same day? Where is the logic? Criminals do not apply for gun permits because they know and don't want to get caught because the gun can be traced.
Another fallacy initiated by the government and Prosecutors is the “Gun Buy Back Programs”. First and foremost: How can you buy back something that you never sold? Second: Where can you go and buy Brand Named Rifles, Shot Guns and hand guns which sell for far more than the ridiculous price of $150-200.00 offered by these absurd buy back programs? Third: These idiotic programs target only law abiding citizens who are unfamiliar with the draconian gun laws of this backwards State relevant to gun possession and who see a way to get a quick buck because they wish to remain law compliant. Fourth and final : Criminals don’t turn in their guns ,!!! BECAUSE THEY NEED THEM FOR WORK!!!!!
The stupid ass law makers in this state and country have it all backwards. Where the guns are coming from and are illegally purchased are on the black market. It's just like during prohibition. When you tell people that they cannot have something that they want, you are going to have a proliferation of illegal gun dealers providing what's prohibited. Targeting and punishing honest law abiding citizens to get at criminals is a blatant violation of the U.S Constitution which protect the Civil Rights of all law abiding citizens. New Jersey is one of the biggest violators. If you think N.J Gun Laws work, just do the math look at the crime and Murder rates in Newark, Jersey City, Camden, Paterson, Trenton (State Capitol no less) etc, Get the point? Read or listen to the news or papers.
Friday, February 19, 2010
!!! URGENT !!! URGENT !!! URGENT!!! !!! URGENT!!!
IF YOU’VE BEEN CHARGED WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN WARREN
COUNTY, N.J. EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES CIVIL AND CRIMINAL,AND YOUR FIREARMS AND PURCHASER I.D. CARD SEIZED PURSUANT TO A FORFEITURE ORDER, ISSUED BY THE SUPERIOR COURT AND APPLIED FOR BY THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE BEFORE OR PRIOR TO JAN-1999-PRESENT, YOUR FIREARMS AND I.D. CARD MAY HAVE BEEN SEIZED ILLEGALLY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.
HIGHLY TRAINED INVESTIGATORS WITHIN OUR LEGAL UNIT HAVE RECENTLY UNCOVERED IMPROPRIETY AND UNLAWFUL PRACTICES UTILIZED ON A ROUTINE BASIS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF WARREN COUNTY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF YOUR PROPERTY DURING
DOMESTIC SITUATIONS. IF YOU FEEL YOU ARE OR MAY HAVE BEEN A VICTIM, WE’D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU ASAP. WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP .
FOR FURTHER INFO CONTACT US AT :
THE NATIONAL/ NEW JERSEY POLICE SOLIDARITY COALITION INC.
P.O. BOX 72
SOUTH ORANGE, NEW JERSEY 07079
OR
Google us at: www.npscinc.blogger.com
E-MAIL : HELPKOP@ATT.NET
“ A WATCH DOG AGENCY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS ”
N/N.J.P.S.C. Inc. is a non profit consulting firm , proponents of Pro-Se advocates, retired and active law enforcement personnel charged under false pretenses. We specialize in domestic violence and firearms forfeiture litigation.
[This association is comprised of volunteer free lance para legals, active and retired Law Enforcement Professionals with over 107 years of experience collectively in the Law Enforcement field.]
IF YOU’VE BEEN CHARGED WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN WARREN
COUNTY, N.J. EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES CIVIL AND CRIMINAL,AND YOUR FIREARMS AND PURCHASER I.D. CARD SEIZED PURSUANT TO A FORFEITURE ORDER, ISSUED BY THE SUPERIOR COURT AND APPLIED FOR BY THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE BEFORE OR PRIOR TO JAN-1999-PRESENT, YOUR FIREARMS AND I.D. CARD MAY HAVE BEEN SEIZED ILLEGALLY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.
HIGHLY TRAINED INVESTIGATORS WITHIN OUR LEGAL UNIT HAVE RECENTLY UNCOVERED IMPROPRIETY AND UNLAWFUL PRACTICES UTILIZED ON A ROUTINE BASIS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF WARREN COUNTY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF YOUR PROPERTY DURING
DOMESTIC SITUATIONS. IF YOU FEEL YOU ARE OR MAY HAVE BEEN A VICTIM, WE’D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU ASAP. WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP .
FOR FURTHER INFO CONTACT US AT :
THE NATIONAL/ NEW JERSEY POLICE SOLIDARITY COALITION INC.
P.O. BOX 72
SOUTH ORANGE, NEW JERSEY 07079
OR
Google us at: www.npscinc.blogger.com
E-MAIL : HELPKOP@ATT.NET
“ A WATCH DOG AGENCY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS ”
N/N.J.P.S.C. Inc. is a non profit consulting firm , proponents of Pro-Se advocates, retired and active law enforcement personnel charged under false pretenses. We specialize in domestic violence and firearms forfeiture litigation.
[This association is comprised of volunteer free lance para legals, active and retired Law Enforcement Professionals with over 107 years of experience collectively in the Law Enforcement field.]
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Police Organization cite Prosecutors use Domestic violence
laws as tools of oppression against innocent Officers.
(2nd of a series)
A non profit Police Organization and consulting firm, known as the National/New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc. which specialize and assist active and retired Law Enforcement Officers charged with domestic violence under false pretenses recently cited :When a Law Enforcement Officer secures an order of protection (restraining order) for themselves, they are summarily ostracized, denigrated, humiliated and rebuked by Prosecutor Officials for utilizing the law in which they are statutorily bound.
The firm cited Prosecutor Officials do not follow procedures promulgated within the domestic violence statutes when officers are victims. They flagrantly subjugate the rules of law. Example: pursuant to a provision within the N.J. Criminal Statutes and codes which provides protection to all victims of domestic violence, it specifically cite:
“ No victim shall be denied relief or arrested or charged under this act with an offense because the victim used reasonable force in self defense against domestic violence by an attacker.” The defense said officers utilized was obtaining and order of protection against their attacker and were themselves summarily penalized by Prosecution Officials for following the rules of law. It should be noted Prosecutor Officials initiate this action upon receiving a counter signed frivolous complaint for retribution by the offender.
The N.J. Domestic statutes mandate: prior to issuance of a restraining order the following protocol should be adhered to : (1) A preliminary or exploratory investigation must be conducted upon receipt of a complaint of domestic violence(2) ascertain if victim exhibits any signs of injury sustained by an act of domestic violence. (3) Does probable cause exist? (4) If and is a warrant in effect or was it violated by the offender? (5) If any weapons were involved or used? (6) If an act of domestic violence actually transpired? (7) If a restraining order is needed ? or (8) Was their intent?
During our review of all Prosecutor personnel policy an investigation procedures within the complaints submitted against the accused Officers. We observed none of the aforementioned criteria was ever utilized, instituted ,exhibited or followed pursuant to the relevant statutes. Upon further examination we observed the complaints signed against the Officers were bogus, misplaced, without merit, void of any sustainable evidence in which an act of domestic violence could be applicable or actionable pursuant to the relevant statutes. We further observed all complaints signed against the Officers by their adversaries prior to hearing date were eventually dropped, dismissed, recanted or some failed to appear to avoid embarrassment as no sustainable facts of their allegations could be produce by themselves or prosecutor officials.
Example: Recently several law enforcement officers returning from their active tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan were served with restraining orders. One individual served as an ordinance and weapons training officer and the others infantry, demolition or enlisted men. All individuals upon reporting to their respective law enforcement divisions were welcomed back with orders of restraint, disarmed and are now placed on modified duty. What’s perplexing is these individuals placed their lives on the line thousand of miles away in a foreign land to protect the ideals, freedom and liberties of this country.
What’s disturbing and repugnant is upon these individuals return, they’re stripped of the very same liberties and ideals they swore to defend protect and uphold protected by the U.S. Constitution predicated upon fabricated lies of revenge and retribution. These officers are devastated and shocked as there tours required them to serve for several years. What they cannot understand is how could they be a threat to anyone when they are thousand of miles away just trying to stay a live? “ This is insulting and unbelievable complained one affected officer, we’re all innocent”. The restraining orders were issued prior to their arrivals and signed by jilted lover’s, cohabitants and spouses who have entered new relationships or wanted out of relationships.
As cited before, the present domestic violence legislation is utilized by individuals versed in the mechanics of securing said orders, wield it as a sword of mass destruction for retribution, child support and leverage in matrimonial matters. Examining these matters collectively ,our legal and investigative teams concluded, Prosecutors Officials are deficient of experience when investigating domestic issues. As purveyors of law their expertise to investigate attach or identify any violations within domestic complaints are limited. Prosecutor Officials read the language of the domestic violence statutes but are ignorant to it’s legislative intent. What’s disgusting is the Legislators, Politicians, Courts, Attorney General and Prosecutor officials all are aware of this abuse and none of them have done anything to stop, prohibit, thwart or discourage this practice.
In the matter of prosecutor officials obtaining orders of forfeiture for possession of law enforcement officers personal weapons when involved in domestic situations. We investigated complaints by the officers regarding said procedure utilized by prosecutor officials. The officers complained and questioned “ When all complaints have been dismissed or adjudicated during court proceeding and no acts of domestic violence could be proven or sustained, why have they not been rearmed, or their personal weapons have not been returned for such excessive periods of time”?. Armed with the aforementioned facts we summarized the Officers were being arbitrarily penalized for obtaining a restraining order for their own protection before their adversaries. We further reasoned they were being summarily punished on the strength of counter complaints signed by their offenders. However case law mandates in the matter of State of N.J. v. Warrick :
“ A weapons forfeiture action may not proceed if the domestic violence complaint upon which the motion is drawn has been dismissed”.
The aforementioned law is applicable to the officers and synonymous with their situations as all motions upon which the complaints by their adversaries were dismissed favorably to them. Observing this we conclude, all complaints were dismissed by the Courts, all officers were exonerated and the forfeiture process could not transpire as the complaint in which the prosecutor officials motion was predicated had been dismissed.
However in all cases we observed prosecutor officials proceeded anyway implementing fraudulent affidavits to the Courts for seizure of weapons, while culpable and with total disregard of the aforementioned law and officers rights. Subsequent to our investigation regarding such seizures we observed numerous unlawful statutory violations were implemented against these officers by prosecutor officials.
One such flagrant act and unlawful practice utilized by a particular Prosecutor agency caught our attention, which had been reported to the Court of incident with documented evidence of official misconduct, perjury, and false swearing. Said Presiding Judge totally disregarded the complaint, refused to address, investigate or institute any corrective action. The violations the prosecutor agency incorporates and flagrantly practices is the utilization of a prewritten form letter, which also serves as an affidavit and search warrant. The form cites said named individual had been found guilty of an act of domestic violence and petitions the Court for an order of forfeiture to seize all weapons, while full aware the case had not come to trial. What we found disturbing is this particular agency applied for an order of forfeiture two weeks prior to the projected hearing date, citing said named individual on the request order had been found guilty of an act of domestic violence.
What’s perplexing and disturbing is, how could the prosecutor official possibly apply for an order where as the hearing date regarding said incident would not commence for another ten (10) days. What’s astounding is, upon commencement of the hearing, the Officer was found not guilty and exonerated of all charges?
It should be noted the procedure to obtain a search warrant or order of forfeiture must be accompanied by an affidavit citing probable cause, sworn oath or affirmation that the facts an circumstances within said application are true and must pass judicial scrutiny prior to issuance. If this is not done the order is no good on it’s face. Upon further examination our investigative and legal team observed the order was signed and authorized by a Superior Court Judge. The questions at issue are : How did it get pass the scrutiny of the authorizing Judge? Was the authorizing Judge aware of this violation before signing it? Did the authorizing Judge read the request thoroughly pursuant to statute? Was the authorizing Judge aware the case had not been heard? Was the authorizing judge aware the document she was signing was a form letter? Was the authorizing Judge in collusion with the prosecutor official?
Observing this impropriety our legal team investigated further and discovered several other individuals seeking our assistance were also in possession of the same pre written documents issued under similar circumstances within the same prosecutorial jurisdiction. It’s should be noted, prosecutor officials arbitrarily pick and choose any frivolous charge within the domestic statutes in which they feel would justify their actions of penalization against innocent officers charged under false pretenses pursuant to the Domestic Violence Act of 1991. Prosecutor Officials feel they have the authority to subjugate officers rights predicated upon the N.J. Attorney Generals Directive 2003-04 which mandates the procedure in which law enforcement personnel are to be handle in domestic situations.
They are under the distinct misconception their unlawful acts are covered under the shield of qualified immunity. It should be so noted the N.J. Criminal Statute cites: “qualified immunity is applicable to all but the mentally incompetent and those who knowingly violate the law." If prosecutorial officials act outside the scope of their official capacity, they are liable an not covered by the cloak of qualified immunity.
Example: One officer involved in a domestic situation complained he received a written mandate from a prosecutor official, in which he was ordered to make a clean break from his spouse and show proof of the divorce contingent upon his being rearmed and returned to active service. Here the prosecutor officials went beyond the scope of their office and are liable for suit. Prosecutor Officials do not encumber the statutory authority to perform marriages, nor order or grant divorces. Everyone has the right to be married. If any individual feels they have been unlawfully deprived of their liberties by any prosecutorial officials, you are entitled to seek compensatory damages as they are not immune from suit.
National/New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
P.O. Box 72
S. Orange, N.J. 07079
www.npscinc.bloggerspot.com
January 28, 2010
cc:
Associated Press
CNN
N.J. Voice
Star Ledger
News 12
laws as tools of oppression against innocent Officers.
(2nd of a series)
A non profit Police Organization and consulting firm, known as the National/New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc. which specialize and assist active and retired Law Enforcement Officers charged with domestic violence under false pretenses recently cited :When a Law Enforcement Officer secures an order of protection (restraining order) for themselves, they are summarily ostracized, denigrated, humiliated and rebuked by Prosecutor Officials for utilizing the law in which they are statutorily bound.
The firm cited Prosecutor Officials do not follow procedures promulgated within the domestic violence statutes when officers are victims. They flagrantly subjugate the rules of law. Example: pursuant to a provision within the N.J. Criminal Statutes and codes which provides protection to all victims of domestic violence, it specifically cite:
“ No victim shall be denied relief or arrested or charged under this act with an offense because the victim used reasonable force in self defense against domestic violence by an attacker.” The defense said officers utilized was obtaining and order of protection against their attacker and were themselves summarily penalized by Prosecution Officials for following the rules of law. It should be noted Prosecutor Officials initiate this action upon receiving a counter signed frivolous complaint for retribution by the offender.
The N.J. Domestic statutes mandate: prior to issuance of a restraining order the following protocol should be adhered to : (1) A preliminary or exploratory investigation must be conducted upon receipt of a complaint of domestic violence(2) ascertain if victim exhibits any signs of injury sustained by an act of domestic violence. (3) Does probable cause exist? (4) If and is a warrant in effect or was it violated by the offender? (5) If any weapons were involved or used? (6) If an act of domestic violence actually transpired? (7) If a restraining order is needed ? or (8) Was their intent?
During our review of all Prosecutor personnel policy an investigation procedures within the complaints submitted against the accused Officers. We observed none of the aforementioned criteria was ever utilized, instituted ,exhibited or followed pursuant to the relevant statutes. Upon further examination we observed the complaints signed against the Officers were bogus, misplaced, without merit, void of any sustainable evidence in which an act of domestic violence could be applicable or actionable pursuant to the relevant statutes. We further observed all complaints signed against the Officers by their adversaries prior to hearing date were eventually dropped, dismissed, recanted or some failed to appear to avoid embarrassment as no sustainable facts of their allegations could be produce by themselves or prosecutor officials.
Example: Recently several law enforcement officers returning from their active tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan were served with restraining orders. One individual served as an ordinance and weapons training officer and the others infantry, demolition or enlisted men. All individuals upon reporting to their respective law enforcement divisions were welcomed back with orders of restraint, disarmed and are now placed on modified duty. What’s perplexing is these individuals placed their lives on the line thousand of miles away in a foreign land to protect the ideals, freedom and liberties of this country.
What’s disturbing and repugnant is upon these individuals return, they’re stripped of the very same liberties and ideals they swore to defend protect and uphold protected by the U.S. Constitution predicated upon fabricated lies of revenge and retribution. These officers are devastated and shocked as there tours required them to serve for several years. What they cannot understand is how could they be a threat to anyone when they are thousand of miles away just trying to stay a live? “ This is insulting and unbelievable complained one affected officer, we’re all innocent”. The restraining orders were issued prior to their arrivals and signed by jilted lover’s, cohabitants and spouses who have entered new relationships or wanted out of relationships.
As cited before, the present domestic violence legislation is utilized by individuals versed in the mechanics of securing said orders, wield it as a sword of mass destruction for retribution, child support and leverage in matrimonial matters. Examining these matters collectively ,our legal and investigative teams concluded, Prosecutors Officials are deficient of experience when investigating domestic issues. As purveyors of law their expertise to investigate attach or identify any violations within domestic complaints are limited. Prosecutor Officials read the language of the domestic violence statutes but are ignorant to it’s legislative intent. What’s disgusting is the Legislators, Politicians, Courts, Attorney General and Prosecutor officials all are aware of this abuse and none of them have done anything to stop, prohibit, thwart or discourage this practice.
In the matter of prosecutor officials obtaining orders of forfeiture for possession of law enforcement officers personal weapons when involved in domestic situations. We investigated complaints by the officers regarding said procedure utilized by prosecutor officials. The officers complained and questioned “ When all complaints have been dismissed or adjudicated during court proceeding and no acts of domestic violence could be proven or sustained, why have they not been rearmed, or their personal weapons have not been returned for such excessive periods of time”?. Armed with the aforementioned facts we summarized the Officers were being arbitrarily penalized for obtaining a restraining order for their own protection before their adversaries. We further reasoned they were being summarily punished on the strength of counter complaints signed by their offenders. However case law mandates in the matter of State of N.J. v. Warrick :
“ A weapons forfeiture action may not proceed if the domestic violence complaint upon which the motion is drawn has been dismissed”.
The aforementioned law is applicable to the officers and synonymous with their situations as all motions upon which the complaints by their adversaries were dismissed favorably to them. Observing this we conclude, all complaints were dismissed by the Courts, all officers were exonerated and the forfeiture process could not transpire as the complaint in which the prosecutor officials motion was predicated had been dismissed.
However in all cases we observed prosecutor officials proceeded anyway implementing fraudulent affidavits to the Courts for seizure of weapons, while culpable and with total disregard of the aforementioned law and officers rights. Subsequent to our investigation regarding such seizures we observed numerous unlawful statutory violations were implemented against these officers by prosecutor officials.
One such flagrant act and unlawful practice utilized by a particular Prosecutor agency caught our attention, which had been reported to the Court of incident with documented evidence of official misconduct, perjury, and false swearing. Said Presiding Judge totally disregarded the complaint, refused to address, investigate or institute any corrective action. The violations the prosecutor agency incorporates and flagrantly practices is the utilization of a prewritten form letter, which also serves as an affidavit and search warrant. The form cites said named individual had been found guilty of an act of domestic violence and petitions the Court for an order of forfeiture to seize all weapons, while full aware the case had not come to trial. What we found disturbing is this particular agency applied for an order of forfeiture two weeks prior to the projected hearing date, citing said named individual on the request order had been found guilty of an act of domestic violence.
What’s perplexing and disturbing is, how could the prosecutor official possibly apply for an order where as the hearing date regarding said incident would not commence for another ten (10) days. What’s astounding is, upon commencement of the hearing, the Officer was found not guilty and exonerated of all charges?
It should be noted the procedure to obtain a search warrant or order of forfeiture must be accompanied by an affidavit citing probable cause, sworn oath or affirmation that the facts an circumstances within said application are true and must pass judicial scrutiny prior to issuance. If this is not done the order is no good on it’s face. Upon further examination our investigative and legal team observed the order was signed and authorized by a Superior Court Judge. The questions at issue are : How did it get pass the scrutiny of the authorizing Judge? Was the authorizing Judge aware of this violation before signing it? Did the authorizing Judge read the request thoroughly pursuant to statute? Was the authorizing Judge aware the case had not been heard? Was the authorizing judge aware the document she was signing was a form letter? Was the authorizing Judge in collusion with the prosecutor official?
Observing this impropriety our legal team investigated further and discovered several other individuals seeking our assistance were also in possession of the same pre written documents issued under similar circumstances within the same prosecutorial jurisdiction. It’s should be noted, prosecutor officials arbitrarily pick and choose any frivolous charge within the domestic statutes in which they feel would justify their actions of penalization against innocent officers charged under false pretenses pursuant to the Domestic Violence Act of 1991. Prosecutor Officials feel they have the authority to subjugate officers rights predicated upon the N.J. Attorney Generals Directive 2003-04 which mandates the procedure in which law enforcement personnel are to be handle in domestic situations.
They are under the distinct misconception their unlawful acts are covered under the shield of qualified immunity. It should be so noted the N.J. Criminal Statute cites: “qualified immunity is applicable to all but the mentally incompetent and those who knowingly violate the law." If prosecutorial officials act outside the scope of their official capacity, they are liable an not covered by the cloak of qualified immunity.
Example: One officer involved in a domestic situation complained he received a written mandate from a prosecutor official, in which he was ordered to make a clean break from his spouse and show proof of the divorce contingent upon his being rearmed and returned to active service. Here the prosecutor officials went beyond the scope of their office and are liable for suit. Prosecutor Officials do not encumber the statutory authority to perform marriages, nor order or grant divorces. Everyone has the right to be married. If any individual feels they have been unlawfully deprived of their liberties by any prosecutorial officials, you are entitled to seek compensatory damages as they are not immune from suit.
National/New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
P.O. Box 72
S. Orange, N.J. 07079
www.npscinc.bloggerspot.com
January 28, 2010
cc:
Associated Press
CNN
N.J. Voice
Star Ledger
News 12
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
CORRUPTION AWARNESS FLYER WARREN COUNTY
!!! URGENT !!! URGENT !!! URGENT!!! !!! URGENT!!! PLEASE RESPOND ASAP!!!!!!
IF YOU’VE BEEN CHARGED WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN WARREN COUNTY, N.J. EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES CIVIL AND CRIMINAL,AND YOUR FIREARMS AND PURCHASER I.D. CARD SEIZED PURSUANT TO A FORFEITURE ORDER, ISSUED BY THE SUPERIOR COURT AND APPLIED FOR BY THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE BEFORE OR PRIOR TO JAN-1999-PRESENT, YOUR FIREARMS AND I.D. CARD MAY HAVE BEEN SEIZED ILLEGALLY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.
HIGHLY TRAINED INVESTIGATORS WITHIN OUR LEGAL UNIT HAVE RECENTLY UNCOVERED IMPROPRIETY AND UNLAWFUL PRACTICES UTILIZED ON A ROUTINE BASIS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF WARREN COUNTY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF YOUR PROPERTY DURING
DOMESTIC SITUATIONS. IF YOU FEEL YOU ARE OR MAY HAVE BEEN A VICTIM, WE’D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU ASAP. WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP .
FOR FURTHER INFO CONTACT US AT :
THE NATIONAL/ NEW JERSEY POLICE SOLIDARITY COALITION INC.
P.O. BOX 72
SOUTH ORANGE, NEW JERSEY 07079
OR
Google us at: www.npscinc.blogger.com
OR
E-MAIL : HELPKOP@ATT.NET
“ A WATCH DOG AGENCY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS ”
N/N.J.P.S.C. Inc. is a non profit consulting firm , proponents of Pro-Se advocates, retired and active law enforcement personnel charged under false pretenses. We specialize in domestic violence and firearms forfeiture litigation.
[This association is comprised of volunteer free lance para legals, active and retired Law Enforcement Professionals with over 107 years of experience collectively in the Law Enforcement field.]
IF YOU’VE BEEN CHARGED WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN WARREN COUNTY, N.J. EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES CIVIL AND CRIMINAL,AND YOUR FIREARMS AND PURCHASER I.D. CARD SEIZED PURSUANT TO A FORFEITURE ORDER, ISSUED BY THE SUPERIOR COURT AND APPLIED FOR BY THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE BEFORE OR PRIOR TO JAN-1999-PRESENT, YOUR FIREARMS AND I.D. CARD MAY HAVE BEEN SEIZED ILLEGALLY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.
HIGHLY TRAINED INVESTIGATORS WITHIN OUR LEGAL UNIT HAVE RECENTLY UNCOVERED IMPROPRIETY AND UNLAWFUL PRACTICES UTILIZED ON A ROUTINE BASIS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF WARREN COUNTY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF YOUR PROPERTY DURING
DOMESTIC SITUATIONS. IF YOU FEEL YOU ARE OR MAY HAVE BEEN A VICTIM, WE’D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU ASAP. WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP .
FOR FURTHER INFO CONTACT US AT :
THE NATIONAL/ NEW JERSEY POLICE SOLIDARITY COALITION INC.
P.O. BOX 72
SOUTH ORANGE, NEW JERSEY 07079
OR
Google us at: www.npscinc.blogger.com
OR
E-MAIL : HELPKOP@ATT.NET
“ A WATCH DOG AGENCY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS ”
N/N.J.P.S.C. Inc. is a non profit consulting firm , proponents of Pro-Se advocates, retired and active law enforcement personnel charged under false pretenses. We specialize in domestic violence and firearms forfeiture litigation.
[This association is comprised of volunteer free lance para legals, active and retired Law Enforcement Professionals with over 107 years of experience collectively in the Law Enforcement field.]
COMPLAINT IN OPPOSITION TO NEW DV BILL
From the Office of the President
January 19, 2010
To: N.J. Assembly Women:
Hon. Linda Greenstein (D-Mercer)
Hon. L .Grace Spencer-(D-Essex)
Hon. Valerie Huttle- (D-Bergen)
Hon. Joan Voss-(D-Bergen)
Re: Domestic Violence Bills- 4363-67 Complaint.
Dear Madame’s:
In response to the above captioned matter, this Agency has been contacted with inundated phone calls from irate active and retired members within the Law Enforcement Community who are and were DV victims of false allegations, to relay their concerns regarding an article placed within the N.J. Daily Record dated Jan.04,2010. The article cited you ladies (collectively) are submitting a package of new domestic violence bills to enhance the existing domestic violence legislation to offer more legal protections to abused women. The article quoted you cited from estimates that one in four women will experience some type of domestic violence during their lives. It should be so noted with that being said as the pro side. The con side promulgated upon estimates would be fair to assume the other three would encumber false allegations, dismissals and or male victims.
The article further cited the five bill package would update state laws to impose more stringent penalties for violators and create new criminal domestic violence offenses. Examining the aforementioned statement objectively, we concur if the proposed package would include a provision to penalize individuals which file false claims of domestic violence against innocent law enforcement officers for retaliatory purposes.
We further request a statutory mandate be implemented upon violators by the administers of justice ( Courts, AG, Prosecutors, Police, etc) to enforce penalties which are in place and not utilized such as : (1) perjury 3rd degree crime, (2) false swearing,(3)inconsistent statements 4th degree crimes, (4) un sworn falsification to authorities 4th degree crime, (5) filing a false report to law enforcement authorities to implicate another 4th degree crime, a mandatory $10,000.00 fine, 10 years jail time or both. Said penalties would be a deterrent to violators who abuse said legislation for retaliatory purposes and tremendously reduce the amount of frivolous claims.
It should be noted restraining orders destroy lives, careers, the family structure, it separates families, it promotes contention, perjury, divorce, mental anguish, suicide, it decimates relationships, creates financial hardships, it subverts any avenue of reconciliation which would other wise be reached amicably without this weapon of mass destruction. The present domestic legislation has been utilized as a catalyst for retribution and revenge by offenders versed in the working mechanics of it’s applicability to innocent law enforcement officers. The act promotes abuse as it provides a comfort zone of protection to offenders who knowingly violate the law and file fraudulent allegations of domestic violence, without fear of reprisal or punishment.
It is a well known fact among (legislators, Courts, AG, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement, Public & DV Offenders etc.) of the simplicity to secure an order of protection against a law enforcement officer for leverage in matrimonial and child custody litigations. All need be said is: “ The Officer pulled a gun on me, and I’m in fear for my life” and said order is issued immediately sight unseen no questions asked. It should be further noted, the routine practice of issuing an additional order of restraint to the offender is unwarranted and a waste of the Courts time as the first order is in force and neither complaining party may violate same. What’s highly inconceivable is this routine practice is never addressed, investigated or discouraged. It’s disturbing to hear law makers print and cite the comment: “We view matters of domestic violence very serious”. What’s paradoxical is how serious can it be taken, as no safeguards have been drafted, exist or implemented to prevent abuse of the statutory scheme? We ask that you consider this matter very carefully and thoroughly.
In response to the Hon. Assemblywoman L. Grace Spencer’s bill (AS-4365) “Justification for self defense for domestic violence victims”. We agree this matter should be addressed and applicable to every innocent victim regardless of race, creed, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation or profession. As it stands now, there are no protective mechanisms in place for a claim of self defense applicable to any law enforcement victim securing a restraining order for their personal protection, from an offender who can summarily sign a counter complaint of domestic violence under false pretenses. N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-21(b) (3) of the Domestic Violence Act of 1991 specifically cite: “ No victim shall be denied relief or arrested or charged under this act with an offense because the victim used reasonable force in self defense against domestic violence by an attacker.”
It should be noted, the statute is absolute, it does not delineate or exclude any particular individual, group or persons who may be protected under this Act. The Legislative intent specifically cite: The purpose of the Domestic Violence Act is to protect the victim not punish the offender”. However this is not true when law enforcement personnel are victims. They are treated entirely different or as the offender by law administrators. How ever this defense is never accepted, entertained nor enforced by the Courts, AG, or Prosecutor Officials. This practice is flagrantly ignored and overlooked upon presentation as a defense by innocent Law Enforcement victims.
This association request an addendum be instituted within your package mandating it’s institution be administered equally (male ,female, law enforcement, etc.) without prejudice regardless if said defense is physical or non physical (example : any victim obtaining an order or voluntary leaving the premises to avoid confrontation and or being assaulted etc) should be considered an acceptable defense for immunity.
Law Enforcement are the only collective entity which suffer severe penalties by this degrading legislation when charged under false pretenses. The individual is immediately deprived of their rights protected by the constitution, disarmed of their service and personal weapons and firearms I..D. card as per the N.J. AG directive for law enforcement officers involved in domestic situations. They are subjected to the restrictive mandates of the AG directive, possible termination, revocation of their privilege to secure additional secular employment to financially support themselves. They are displaced from their residence, family and loved ones, mandated to attend psychological counseling and anger management sessions at their own expense before being considered or returned to active service. They are further humiliated and punished by the AG and Prosecutors with excessive waiting times to be rearmed ( 2yrs-until they are ready).
Their other wise clean record is tarnished as it has been placed within the domestic violence registry regardless of exoneration in which they must pay to have expunged. For example : A carpenter, sanitation technician, mechanic, politician, postal worker, doctor, lawyer, etc working in a non law enforcement capacity if charged with an unsubstantiated allegation of domestic violence may continue to work and support themselves without interruption, where as a law enforcement officer is prohibited.
We request an addendum be implemented within your package for legislation to penalize violators of this practice. It does not require much research or effort as the penalties are in place and need legislation to mandate enforcement of: N.J.S.A 2C: 28 as it pertains to false allegations of DV at the Judicial and Executive levels. We agree if this legislation is implemented along with fines and mandatory jail time the practice of filing false allegations against innocent victims of domestic violence will be reduced tremendously. It should be noted this legislation as it stands, provides total protection to all offenders who are culpable of their actions as they are aware said acts are covered with total impunity.
The article cite your mission is to bolster the rights of abused women and offer them more legal protection. Examining the Domestic Violence Act of 1991 objectively, it’s contents does not specify it’s applicability to any particular sex, sexual orientation, gender, race, nationality, religion, creed, occupation or ethnic group. It specifically cite: “ Domestic Violence means: the occurrence of one or more of the following listed disabilities which encompass violence inflicted upon a person protected under this act by an adult or emancipated minor. It should be so noted nation wide more than one million false allegations of domestic violence are filed each year.
On or about March 2002 The Center for Disease Control of Atlanta, Georgia conducted a National funded survey regarding Domestic Violence. Their survey found and disclosed that nearly 40% of all the victims or 835,000 men a year are victims of physical abuse by their intimate female partners. They further discovered men are reluctant to come forward or report they were beaten by their female counter parts.
They observed (Men) their reluctance was fueled by male egos as victims and would be embarrassing, if reported they were beaten or assaulted by their female counter parts. Examine the following articles and you decide if more stringent laws are needed to bolster Domestic Violence Legislation.
Star Ledger-February 14,2001- “Top Justice ask if conduct by judge warrants her removal. Ewing Twp. N J : Supreme Court Justices questioned yesterday whether misconduct by a Superior Court Judge was serious enough to warrant her removal from the bench. On April 14,2000 the 48 year old judge flew into a public rage at two Mercer County restaurants during a dispute with her ex-beau a Mercer County Sheriff’s Officer 20 years her junior who was with another woman. The judge stalked, harassed and threatened the Officer with her Office, later impersonating a Police Officer for assistance for retaliatory purposes.
Star- Ledger :March 26,2002: -“Woman facing charges of trying to maim Spouse”
A Hillsborough, N.J. woman tried to slice off her husband’s penis while he was sleeping. Authorities said the man was in a futon bed in the living room of the couples home bleeding from the groin area when they arrived. The man related to the Police that when the pain awoke him, he noticed his wife over him and walking toward the kitchen with a large knife with a brown handle.
“Star-Ledger :January 31,2007 -“Woman charged in stabbing of beau”
Newark, N.J: A resident was arrested yesterday after she allegedly stabbed her live in boyfriend during a fight, police said. “According to Police the fight was over money”.
Star-Ledger : January 31,2007 – “Wife is found guilty of Marines Murder”
San Diego – A woman was convicted yesterday of murdering her Marine husband with arsenic, so she could cash in on his $250,000 life insurance policy.
Star-Ledger: August 21,2007_”Wife tried to poison husband” Mom of 3 allegedly used antifreeze and cyanide.
Burlington County N.J.: A woman who allegedly served orange juice laced with antifreeze to her now estranged husband-a retired Police Officer. Has been charged by Burlington County Authorities with attempted Murder.
Star-Ledger:November 28,2002 “Companion seized in Linden Man’s Killing.”
Linden N.J.: Linden Police found a 72 year old former bar owner slumped in an easy chair with a gunshot wound to his head, a handgun lay by his side. Union County Authorities charged his longtime companion, with his murder. They say she intentionally
Shot him with a 357 magnum handgun, during a heated argument on November 03,2002.
Star-Ledger : April 09,2007 –“Preachers Wife admits to shooting him dead.”____
Nashville, Tenn.: Authorities said he had been struck by a single blast from a 12 gauge shotgun while he lay in bed.
Star-Ledger: April 11,2007-E.Orange Woman charged in Killing________________
East Orange, N.J.: Authorities said she ran over her boyfriend with her car after a heated verbal dispute which started in a small Orange, N.J. Tavern.
Star-Ledger:January,2007-Jason Kidd charges “Cruelty as he seeks a Divorce”___
Hackensack, N.J: Nets star files to end his 10 year marriage, cites his wife threatened to ruin his career with filing phony domestic violence complaints”
Star Ledger-October 15,2009- Police: Argument led to fatal stabbing____________
Newark, N.J. Police charged a 28 yr old female with stabbing her longtime boy friend to death with a large butcher knife during a heated argument.
Star Ledger: 0ctober 16,2009-Girlfriend charged in Troopers Death______________
Westfield, N.J.: A Union County woman is accused of providing the gun used to kill one Pennsylvania State Trooper and wound another, buy supplying same to her boyfriend.
Star Ledger: October 16,2009- Two women accused in fatal beating______________
Hamilton Township N.J.: Two Camden County women have been charged with the hammer killing of a man whose body was found in a wooded area of Atlantic County. Prosecutors cite both women drove the male victim to Hamilton Township with the intent to rob him, once there ,they allegedly beat him to death with a hammer.
Star Ledger: October 16, 2009-Woman denies charges tied to building blaze_____
Newark, N.J.: Prosecutors cite on May 04,2009 a 51 year old female suspect held a lighted match to a pillow in her fifth floor apartment she shared with her then 77 year old boy friend. Authorities cite the female suspect intended to kill her boyfriend because “he hadn’t used the money she gave him to buy groceries.” The boyfriend was injured but survived.
Star Ledger: October 31, 2009- Muslim woman accused of slashing husband______
New York: A devout Muslim woman told Police she slashed her husband’s neck with a kitchen knife as he slept, because he forced her to eat pork, wear short skirts and drink alcohol in violation of her religious beliefs.
Star Ledger: October 31, 2009- Pair indicted in abuse of 3 disabled women
Warren County, N.J. : Two women one 55 yr old and one 52 yr old have been indicted on charges of mistreating and abusing three residents at a State run facility for disabled adults. One 28 yr old resident died after she was removed from the facility emaciated and unable to speak.
These are but a few incidents individuals should examine, before citing the male gender as the number one aggressor or abuser in domestic violence situations, in which restraining orders are tailor made and most likely issued . We agree there is a need for such legislation in some instances, but a mechanism must be implemented immediately to protect innocent individuals charged under false pretenses for retaliatory purposes. This Association ask the help of the Honorable named Assembly women to include our listed suggestions upon implementation of their domestic violence package, be considered thoroughly, fairly, impartially and equally with the goal to preserve each and every individuals rights protected by the U.S. Constitution and not predicated upon race, gender, nationality or occupation . The pre-amble of the United States Constitution read :
“We the People for the People and by the People.”
This commentary written by :
NATIONAL / N.J. Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
Eric Washington-President
P.O. Box 72
South Orange, New Jersey 07079
Google: www.npscinc.blogger.com
e-mail : helpkop@att.net
cc:
N.J. Senate President
Hon. Stephen Sweeny
Associated Press
N.J. News
News 12.com
N.J. Daily Record
N.J. Voices .com
Star Ledger.com
(Disclaimer): The above articles were not utilized to accuse or attack any specific, individual, race, creed, gender, organization, or affiliation. These articles were comprised for information and awareness only. These articles can be verified at www.StarLedger.com
January 19, 2010
To: N.J. Assembly Women:
Hon. Linda Greenstein (D-Mercer)
Hon. L .Grace Spencer-(D-Essex)
Hon. Valerie Huttle- (D-Bergen)
Hon. Joan Voss-(D-Bergen)
Re: Domestic Violence Bills- 4363-67 Complaint.
Dear Madame’s:
In response to the above captioned matter, this Agency has been contacted with inundated phone calls from irate active and retired members within the Law Enforcement Community who are and were DV victims of false allegations, to relay their concerns regarding an article placed within the N.J. Daily Record dated Jan.04,2010. The article cited you ladies (collectively) are submitting a package of new domestic violence bills to enhance the existing domestic violence legislation to offer more legal protections to abused women. The article quoted you cited from estimates that one in four women will experience some type of domestic violence during their lives. It should be so noted with that being said as the pro side. The con side promulgated upon estimates would be fair to assume the other three would encumber false allegations, dismissals and or male victims.
The article further cited the five bill package would update state laws to impose more stringent penalties for violators and create new criminal domestic violence offenses. Examining the aforementioned statement objectively, we concur if the proposed package would include a provision to penalize individuals which file false claims of domestic violence against innocent law enforcement officers for retaliatory purposes.
We further request a statutory mandate be implemented upon violators by the administers of justice ( Courts, AG, Prosecutors, Police, etc) to enforce penalties which are in place and not utilized such as : (1) perjury 3rd degree crime, (2) false swearing,(3)inconsistent statements 4th degree crimes, (4) un sworn falsification to authorities 4th degree crime, (5) filing a false report to law enforcement authorities to implicate another 4th degree crime, a mandatory $10,000.00 fine, 10 years jail time or both. Said penalties would be a deterrent to violators who abuse said legislation for retaliatory purposes and tremendously reduce the amount of frivolous claims.
It should be noted restraining orders destroy lives, careers, the family structure, it separates families, it promotes contention, perjury, divorce, mental anguish, suicide, it decimates relationships, creates financial hardships, it subverts any avenue of reconciliation which would other wise be reached amicably without this weapon of mass destruction. The present domestic legislation has been utilized as a catalyst for retribution and revenge by offenders versed in the working mechanics of it’s applicability to innocent law enforcement officers. The act promotes abuse as it provides a comfort zone of protection to offenders who knowingly violate the law and file fraudulent allegations of domestic violence, without fear of reprisal or punishment.
It is a well known fact among (legislators, Courts, AG, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement, Public & DV Offenders etc.) of the simplicity to secure an order of protection against a law enforcement officer for leverage in matrimonial and child custody litigations. All need be said is: “ The Officer pulled a gun on me, and I’m in fear for my life” and said order is issued immediately sight unseen no questions asked. It should be further noted, the routine practice of issuing an additional order of restraint to the offender is unwarranted and a waste of the Courts time as the first order is in force and neither complaining party may violate same. What’s highly inconceivable is this routine practice is never addressed, investigated or discouraged. It’s disturbing to hear law makers print and cite the comment: “We view matters of domestic violence very serious”. What’s paradoxical is how serious can it be taken, as no safeguards have been drafted, exist or implemented to prevent abuse of the statutory scheme? We ask that you consider this matter very carefully and thoroughly.
In response to the Hon. Assemblywoman L. Grace Spencer’s bill (AS-4365) “Justification for self defense for domestic violence victims”. We agree this matter should be addressed and applicable to every innocent victim regardless of race, creed, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation or profession. As it stands now, there are no protective mechanisms in place for a claim of self defense applicable to any law enforcement victim securing a restraining order for their personal protection, from an offender who can summarily sign a counter complaint of domestic violence under false pretenses. N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-21(b) (3) of the Domestic Violence Act of 1991 specifically cite: “ No victim shall be denied relief or arrested or charged under this act with an offense because the victim used reasonable force in self defense against domestic violence by an attacker.”
It should be noted, the statute is absolute, it does not delineate or exclude any particular individual, group or persons who may be protected under this Act. The Legislative intent specifically cite: The purpose of the Domestic Violence Act is to protect the victim not punish the offender”. However this is not true when law enforcement personnel are victims. They are treated entirely different or as the offender by law administrators. How ever this defense is never accepted, entertained nor enforced by the Courts, AG, or Prosecutor Officials. This practice is flagrantly ignored and overlooked upon presentation as a defense by innocent Law Enforcement victims.
This association request an addendum be instituted within your package mandating it’s institution be administered equally (male ,female, law enforcement, etc.) without prejudice regardless if said defense is physical or non physical (example : any victim obtaining an order or voluntary leaving the premises to avoid confrontation and or being assaulted etc) should be considered an acceptable defense for immunity.
Law Enforcement are the only collective entity which suffer severe penalties by this degrading legislation when charged under false pretenses. The individual is immediately deprived of their rights protected by the constitution, disarmed of their service and personal weapons and firearms I..D. card as per the N.J. AG directive for law enforcement officers involved in domestic situations. They are subjected to the restrictive mandates of the AG directive, possible termination, revocation of their privilege to secure additional secular employment to financially support themselves. They are displaced from their residence, family and loved ones, mandated to attend psychological counseling and anger management sessions at their own expense before being considered or returned to active service. They are further humiliated and punished by the AG and Prosecutors with excessive waiting times to be rearmed ( 2yrs-until they are ready).
Their other wise clean record is tarnished as it has been placed within the domestic violence registry regardless of exoneration in which they must pay to have expunged. For example : A carpenter, sanitation technician, mechanic, politician, postal worker, doctor, lawyer, etc working in a non law enforcement capacity if charged with an unsubstantiated allegation of domestic violence may continue to work and support themselves without interruption, where as a law enforcement officer is prohibited.
We request an addendum be implemented within your package for legislation to penalize violators of this practice. It does not require much research or effort as the penalties are in place and need legislation to mandate enforcement of: N.J.S.A 2C: 28 as it pertains to false allegations of DV at the Judicial and Executive levels. We agree if this legislation is implemented along with fines and mandatory jail time the practice of filing false allegations against innocent victims of domestic violence will be reduced tremendously. It should be noted this legislation as it stands, provides total protection to all offenders who are culpable of their actions as they are aware said acts are covered with total impunity.
The article cite your mission is to bolster the rights of abused women and offer them more legal protection. Examining the Domestic Violence Act of 1991 objectively, it’s contents does not specify it’s applicability to any particular sex, sexual orientation, gender, race, nationality, religion, creed, occupation or ethnic group. It specifically cite: “ Domestic Violence means: the occurrence of one or more of the following listed disabilities which encompass violence inflicted upon a person protected under this act by an adult or emancipated minor. It should be so noted nation wide more than one million false allegations of domestic violence are filed each year.
On or about March 2002 The Center for Disease Control of Atlanta, Georgia conducted a National funded survey regarding Domestic Violence. Their survey found and disclosed that nearly 40% of all the victims or 835,000 men a year are victims of physical abuse by their intimate female partners. They further discovered men are reluctant to come forward or report they were beaten by their female counter parts.
They observed (Men) their reluctance was fueled by male egos as victims and would be embarrassing, if reported they were beaten or assaulted by their female counter parts. Examine the following articles and you decide if more stringent laws are needed to bolster Domestic Violence Legislation.
Star Ledger-February 14,2001- “Top Justice ask if conduct by judge warrants her removal. Ewing Twp. N J : Supreme Court Justices questioned yesterday whether misconduct by a Superior Court Judge was serious enough to warrant her removal from the bench. On April 14,2000 the 48 year old judge flew into a public rage at two Mercer County restaurants during a dispute with her ex-beau a Mercer County Sheriff’s Officer 20 years her junior who was with another woman. The judge stalked, harassed and threatened the Officer with her Office, later impersonating a Police Officer for assistance for retaliatory purposes.
Star- Ledger :March 26,2002: -“Woman facing charges of trying to maim Spouse”
A Hillsborough, N.J. woman tried to slice off her husband’s penis while he was sleeping. Authorities said the man was in a futon bed in the living room of the couples home bleeding from the groin area when they arrived. The man related to the Police that when the pain awoke him, he noticed his wife over him and walking toward the kitchen with a large knife with a brown handle.
“Star-Ledger :January 31,2007 -“Woman charged in stabbing of beau”
Newark, N.J: A resident was arrested yesterday after she allegedly stabbed her live in boyfriend during a fight, police said. “According to Police the fight was over money”.
Star-Ledger : January 31,2007 – “Wife is found guilty of Marines Murder”
San Diego – A woman was convicted yesterday of murdering her Marine husband with arsenic, so she could cash in on his $250,000 life insurance policy.
Star-Ledger: August 21,2007_”Wife tried to poison husband” Mom of 3 allegedly used antifreeze and cyanide.
Burlington County N.J.: A woman who allegedly served orange juice laced with antifreeze to her now estranged husband-a retired Police Officer. Has been charged by Burlington County Authorities with attempted Murder.
Star-Ledger:November 28,2002 “Companion seized in Linden Man’s Killing.”
Linden N.J.: Linden Police found a 72 year old former bar owner slumped in an easy chair with a gunshot wound to his head, a handgun lay by his side. Union County Authorities charged his longtime companion, with his murder. They say she intentionally
Shot him with a 357 magnum handgun, during a heated argument on November 03,2002.
Star-Ledger : April 09,2007 –“Preachers Wife admits to shooting him dead.”____
Nashville, Tenn.: Authorities said he had been struck by a single blast from a 12 gauge shotgun while he lay in bed.
Star-Ledger: April 11,2007-E.Orange Woman charged in Killing________________
East Orange, N.J.: Authorities said she ran over her boyfriend with her car after a heated verbal dispute which started in a small Orange, N.J. Tavern.
Star-Ledger:January,2007-Jason Kidd charges “Cruelty as he seeks a Divorce”___
Hackensack, N.J: Nets star files to end his 10 year marriage, cites his wife threatened to ruin his career with filing phony domestic violence complaints”
Star Ledger-October 15,2009- Police: Argument led to fatal stabbing____________
Newark, N.J. Police charged a 28 yr old female with stabbing her longtime boy friend to death with a large butcher knife during a heated argument.
Star Ledger: 0ctober 16,2009-Girlfriend charged in Troopers Death______________
Westfield, N.J.: A Union County woman is accused of providing the gun used to kill one Pennsylvania State Trooper and wound another, buy supplying same to her boyfriend.
Star Ledger: October 16,2009- Two women accused in fatal beating______________
Hamilton Township N.J.: Two Camden County women have been charged with the hammer killing of a man whose body was found in a wooded area of Atlantic County. Prosecutors cite both women drove the male victim to Hamilton Township with the intent to rob him, once there ,they allegedly beat him to death with a hammer.
Star Ledger: October 16, 2009-Woman denies charges tied to building blaze_____
Newark, N.J.: Prosecutors cite on May 04,2009 a 51 year old female suspect held a lighted match to a pillow in her fifth floor apartment she shared with her then 77 year old boy friend. Authorities cite the female suspect intended to kill her boyfriend because “he hadn’t used the money she gave him to buy groceries.” The boyfriend was injured but survived.
Star Ledger: October 31, 2009- Muslim woman accused of slashing husband______
New York: A devout Muslim woman told Police she slashed her husband’s neck with a kitchen knife as he slept, because he forced her to eat pork, wear short skirts and drink alcohol in violation of her religious beliefs.
Star Ledger: October 31, 2009- Pair indicted in abuse of 3 disabled women
Warren County, N.J. : Two women one 55 yr old and one 52 yr old have been indicted on charges of mistreating and abusing three residents at a State run facility for disabled adults. One 28 yr old resident died after she was removed from the facility emaciated and unable to speak.
These are but a few incidents individuals should examine, before citing the male gender as the number one aggressor or abuser in domestic violence situations, in which restraining orders are tailor made and most likely issued . We agree there is a need for such legislation in some instances, but a mechanism must be implemented immediately to protect innocent individuals charged under false pretenses for retaliatory purposes. This Association ask the help of the Honorable named Assembly women to include our listed suggestions upon implementation of their domestic violence package, be considered thoroughly, fairly, impartially and equally with the goal to preserve each and every individuals rights protected by the U.S. Constitution and not predicated upon race, gender, nationality or occupation . The pre-amble of the United States Constitution read :
“We the People for the People and by the People.”
This commentary written by :
NATIONAL / N.J. Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
Eric Washington-President
P.O. Box 72
South Orange, New Jersey 07079
Google: www.npscinc.blogger.com
e-mail : helpkop@att.net
cc:
N.J. Senate President
Hon. Stephen Sweeny
Associated Press
N.J. News
News 12.com
N.J. Daily Record
N.J. Voices .com
Star Ledger.com
(Disclaimer): The above articles were not utilized to accuse or attack any specific, individual, race, creed, gender, organization, or affiliation. These articles were comprised for information and awareness only. These articles can be verified at www.StarLedger.com
Friday, January 8, 2010
N/NJPSC INC. MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP
Name: _____________________________ Date:___________
Address:_______________________________________
City, State, Zip: ________________________________________
Dept./Organization: _____________________________________
Dept./Org. Address: _____________________________________
Rank/Title: ____________________________________________
Years of Service: ________________________________________
Dept./Org. Phone: (____) _________Best Contact # (_____)______
Cell# (____) _____________ E-Mail (optional) _______________
Marital Status: ___________________________________________
Married, Single, Divorced, Cohabitants, Other
Sex:_______(M/F) Age:________ Dob: ________________
Status: Active _____ Retired ______Suspended ______ Terminated _____
Member # __________ (Check one if applicable )
(Official Use Only)
Membership Fee: $25.00
Please make checks payable to:
(Tax –Deductible) New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
P.O. Box #72
South Orange, N.J. 07079-9998
Form#M-1 www.npscinc.blogger.com
Name: _____________________________ Date:___________
Address:_______________________________________
City, State, Zip: ________________________________________
Dept./Organization: _____________________________________
Dept./Org. Address: _____________________________________
Rank/Title: ____________________________________________
Years of Service: ________________________________________
Dept./Org. Phone: (____) _________Best Contact # (_____)______
Cell# (____) _____________ E-Mail (optional) _______________
Marital Status: ___________________________________________
Married, Single, Divorced, Cohabitants, Other
Sex:_______(M/F) Age:________ Dob: ________________
Status: Active _____ Retired ______Suspended ______ Terminated _____
Member # __________ (Check one if applicable )
(Official Use Only)
Membership Fee: $25.00
Please make checks payable to:
(Tax –Deductible) New Jersey Police Solidarity Coalition Inc.
P.O. Box #72
South Orange, N.J. 07079-9998
Form#M-1 www.npscinc.blogger.com
ATTENTION ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT
ARE YOU AWARE ?
1. As a Law Enforcement Officer charged with an unsubstantiated allegation of Domestic Violence, you now have a record in the DV registry file even if you're exonerated? Are you aware you must pay to have it expunged?
2. If you’re served with a T.R.O. and disarmed your Agency does not have to retain you ?
3.The Domestic Violence Laws as written are gender bias ?
4. Un Constitutional ?
5. They violate your 2nd, 4th, 7th, 8th , 14th Amendment Rights?
6. Did you know, once served with a Restraining Order and your weapons are confiscated, a search Warrant must accompany said order citing specifically which items are to be seized and the exact area in which must be searched ? (4th Amendment Right –unreasonable Search and Seizure.)
7. Why is a Restraining Order illegal when it states: “Seize any and all weapons” and not accompanied by a affidavit and or Search Warrant?
( Because a Judge cannot sign a Search Warrant and be the Affiant.)
8. Are you aware there are no “Battered Men Shelters” for displaced abused Male victims of Domestic Violence ?
9. Are you aware no shelters exist for law enforcement officers displaced by TRO’S.
10.Are you aware as a Law Enforcement Officer Male or Female obtaining a order of protection for yourself, you will be penalized and have your weapons taken anyway?
11. Are you aware the N.J. A/G Guidelines as they pertain to Law Enforcement Personnel involved in domestic situations are discriminatory,biased, illegal and
unConstitutional?
12. Are you aware as a Law Enforcement Officer involved in a domestic situation and assaulted by your roommate, spouse, cohabitant etc. “You as a victim are not to be charged or arrested ?(N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-21(3)(d)
13. Are you aware if served with a (TRO) and said order is dismissed. A weapons forfeiture action may not proceed if the Domestic Violence complaint upon which said action was based has been dismissed? (see State v.Warrick, 283 N.J. Super.169 (Ch.Div.1995)
14. Are you aware N.J.S.A. 2C: 39-6 empowers all law enforcement personnel with the authorization to possess firearms,use of deadly force and arrest search and seizure?
15. N.J.S.A. 2C: 58-3 authorize every law abiding citizen and law enforcement officer in the State of N.J. to own posses, purchase, and carry a firearm?
16. N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-19 of the domestic violence legislation and N.J.S.A. 2C:29-7 of the firearms code disqualify anyone convicted of violating any of said offense from owning a firearm ?
17. Are you aware the Attorney Generals Directive 2003-04, violates your constitutional rights?
Want to know more about your rights? Complete the attached application an contact us at the address listed.
1. As a Law Enforcement Officer charged with an unsubstantiated allegation of Domestic Violence, you now have a record in the DV registry file even if you're exonerated? Are you aware you must pay to have it expunged?
2. If you’re served with a T.R.O. and disarmed your Agency does not have to retain you ?
3.The Domestic Violence Laws as written are gender bias ?
4. Un Constitutional ?
5. They violate your 2nd, 4th, 7th, 8th , 14th Amendment Rights?
6. Did you know, once served with a Restraining Order and your weapons are confiscated, a search Warrant must accompany said order citing specifically which items are to be seized and the exact area in which must be searched ? (4th Amendment Right –unreasonable Search and Seizure.)
7. Why is a Restraining Order illegal when it states: “Seize any and all weapons” and not accompanied by a affidavit and or Search Warrant?
( Because a Judge cannot sign a Search Warrant and be the Affiant.)
8. Are you aware there are no “Battered Men Shelters” for displaced abused Male victims of Domestic Violence ?
9. Are you aware no shelters exist for law enforcement officers displaced by TRO’S.
10.Are you aware as a Law Enforcement Officer Male or Female obtaining a order of protection for yourself, you will be penalized and have your weapons taken anyway?
11. Are you aware the N.J. A/G Guidelines as they pertain to Law Enforcement Personnel involved in domestic situations are discriminatory,biased, illegal and
unConstitutional?
12. Are you aware as a Law Enforcement Officer involved in a domestic situation and assaulted by your roommate, spouse, cohabitant etc. “You as a victim are not to be charged or arrested ?(N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-21(3)(d)
13. Are you aware if served with a (TRO) and said order is dismissed. A weapons forfeiture action may not proceed if the Domestic Violence complaint upon which said action was based has been dismissed? (see State v.Warrick, 283 N.J. Super.169 (Ch.Div.1995)
14. Are you aware N.J.S.A. 2C: 39-6 empowers all law enforcement personnel with the authorization to possess firearms,use of deadly force and arrest search and seizure?
15. N.J.S.A. 2C: 58-3 authorize every law abiding citizen and law enforcement officer in the State of N.J. to own posses, purchase, and carry a firearm?
16. N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-19 of the domestic violence legislation and N.J.S.A. 2C:29-7 of the firearms code disqualify anyone convicted of violating any of said offense from owning a firearm ?
17. Are you aware the Attorney Generals Directive 2003-04, violates your constitutional rights?
Want to know more about your rights? Complete the attached application an contact us at the address listed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
